Which of the following statements is/are procedurally correct regarding the landing pattern (approach turn) stall maneuver?

The statement about raising the nose 5-10° high and then reducing power to idle is correct because it aligns with the procedural approach to performing the landing pattern stall maneuver. In this maneuver, the objective is to simulate a stall while in a banked turn, which is a critical aspect of understanding stall characteristics during a landing approach. By raising the nose slightly, the pilot encourages a condition that will lead to a stall, allowing for the examination of aircraft behavior as it approaches that critical angle of attack.

Additionally, reducing the power to idle is crucial as it helps to decrease the lift generated by the wings, further provoking the stall condition. This sequence helps pilots learn to recognize the warning signs of an impending stall and teaches proper recovery techniques. By following this process, pilots can ensure they are safe and well-prepared for real-life scenarios where they may experience a stall during an approach.

The other statements, while containing some valid information, do not align with the proper procedures for initiating and conducting a landing pattern stall maneuver. For instance, maintaining level flight during the approach turn contradicts the goal of intentionally inducing a stall condition, and reducing power to full throttle is not advisable during this maneuver. Thus, the correct understanding of each aspect of the maneuver enhances